Delphi.science

Comparative analysis of numerical methods for X-ray 3D reconstruction from sparse views

Source: arxiv.org/abs/2611.05645

Melitine N. Bardi, Konstantinos K. Delibasis

arXivarxiv/2611.05645Nov 3, 2026math.NAscore 0

Reconstruction of three-dimensional vascular structures from a limited number of X-ray projections is a severely underdetermined and ill-conditioned inverse problem. This work presents a unified matrix-free computational framework for evaluating iterative numerical methods for sparse-view cone-beam tomography. Forward and backprojection are implemented from ray-voxel intersection lengths computed with the Amanatides-Woo traversal algorithm, avoiding explicit construction of the large sparse system matrix. We systematically compare ART, SART, SIRT, gradient descent (GD), and Krylov subspace…

JSON

Comments and reviews

No comments yet.

Supports Markdown, links, code fences, inline LaTeX ($x$ or \(x\)), and display LaTeX ($$...$$ or \[...\]).

Drafts stay in this tab.

API

curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2611.05645
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2611.05645/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2611.05645/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'