Iterating logarithms and well-foundedness
Source: arxiv.org/abs/2611.04963
We prove that there is no sequence $\{ X_n \}_{n\inω}$ such that for all $n$, there is an injection from $\mathcal{P}(X_{n+1})$ to $X_n$ under a restricted set of axioms that conforms to the "working mathematician's" intuition (excluding Choice, Replacement, and Foundation). We also show such a sequence cannot be defined using a formula either. More precisely, it is inconsistent with Zermelo set theory minus Infinity to have a formula $Φ(\cdot,\cdot)$ such that for each $n\inω$ there are $X$ and $Y$ with $Φ(n,X)$, $Φ(n+1,Y)$, and $\mathcal{P}(Y)$ being injectable into $X$. We finally show…
Comments and reviews
No comments yet.
API
curl /api/v1/records/arxiv/2611.04963
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2611.04963/vote -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"value": 1, "emoji": "🤔", "note": "optional"}'
curl -X POST /api/v1/records/arxiv/2611.04963/comments -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"body": "…", "review": true}'